Look up at the night sky and you'll see stars, sure. But you're also seeing planets -- billions and billions of them. At least. That's the conclusion of a new study by astronomers at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) that provides yet more evidence that planetary systems are the cosmic norm. The team made their estimate while analyzing planets orbiting a star called Kepler-32 -- planets that are representative, they say, of the vast majority in the galaxy and thus serve as a perfect case study for understanding how most planets form.
"There's at least 100 billion planets in the galaxy -- just our galaxy," says John Johnson, assistant professor of planetary astronomy at Caltech and coauthor of the study, which was recently accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. "That's mind-boggling."
"It's a staggering number, if you think about it," adds Jonathan Swift, a postdoc at Caltech and lead author of the paper. "Basically there's one of these planets per star."
The planetary system in question, which was detected by the Kepler space telescope, contains five planets. The existence of two of those planets have already been confirmed by other astronomers. The Caltech team confirmed the remaining three, then analyzed the five-planet system and compared it to other systems found by the Kepler mission.
The planets orbit a star that is an M dwarf -- a type that accounts for about three-quarters of all stars in the Milky Way. The five planets, which are similar in size to Earth and orbit close to their star, are also typical of the class of planets that the telescope has discovered orbiting other M dwarfs, Swift says. Therefore, the majority of planets in the galaxy probably have characteristics comparable to those of the five planets.
While this particular system may not be unique, what does set it apart is its coincidental orientation: the orbits of the planets lie in a plane that's positioned such that Kepler views the system edge-on. Due to this rare orientation, each planet blocks Kepler -32's starlight as it passes between the star and the Kepler telescope.
By analyzing changes in the star's brightness, the astronomers were able to determine the planets' characteristics, such as their sizes and orbital periods. This orientation therefore provides an opportunity to study the system in great detail -- and because the planets represent the vast majority of planets that are thought to populate the galaxy, the team says, the system also can help astronomers better understand planet formation in general.
"I usually try not to call things 'Rosetta stones,' but this is as close to a Rosetta stone as anything I've seen," Johnson says. "It's like unlocking a language that we're trying to understand -- the language of planet formation."
One of the fundamental questions regarding the origin of planets is how many of them there are. Like the Caltech group, other teams of astronomers have estimated that there is roughly one planet per star, but this is the first time researchers have made such an estimate by studying M-dwarf systems, the most numerous population of planets known.
To do that calculation, the Caltech team determined the probability that an M-dwarf system would provide Kepler-32's edge-on orientation. Combining that probability with the number of planetary systems Kepler is able to detect, the astronomers calculated that there is, on average, one planet for every one of the approximately 100 billion stars in the galaxy. But their analysis only considers planets that are in close orbits around M dwarfs -- not the outer planets of an M-dwarf system, or those orbiting other kinds of stars. As a result, they say, their estimate is conservative. In fact, says Swift, a more accurate estimate that includes data from other analyses could lead to an average of two planets per star.
M-dwarf systems like Kepler-32's are quite different from our own solar system. For one, M dwarfs are cooler and much smaller than the sun. Kepler-32, for example, has half the mass of the sun and half its radius. The radii of its five planets range from 0.8 to 2.7 times that of Earth, and those planets orbit extremely close to their star. The whole system fits within just over a tenth of an astronomical unit (the average distance between Earth and the sun) -- a distance that is about a third of the radius of Mercury's orbit around the sun. The fact that M-dwarf systems vastly outnumber other kinds of systems carries a profound implication, according to Johnson, which is that our solar system is extremely rare. "It's just a weirdo," he says.
The fact that the planets in M-dwarf systems are so close to their stars doesn't necessarily mean that they're fiery, hellish worlds unsuitable for life, the astronomers say. Indeed, because M dwarfs are small and cool, their temperate zone -- also known as the "habitable zone," the region where liquid water might exist -- is also further inward. Even though only the outermost of Kepler-32's five planets lies in its temperate zone, many other M dwarf systems have more planets that sit right in their temperate zones.
As for how the Kepler-32 system formed, no one knows yet. But the team says its analysis places constraints on possible mechanisms. For example, the results suggest that the planets all formed farther away from the star than they are now, and migrated inward over time.
Like all planets, the ones around Kepler-32 formed from a proto-planetary disk -- a disk of dust and gas that clumped up into planets around the star. The astronomers estimated that the mass of the disk within the region of the five planets was about as much as that of three Jupiters. But other studies of proto-planetary disks have shown that three Jupiter masses can't be squeezed into such a tiny area so close to a star, suggesting to the Caltech team that the planets around Kepler-32 initially formed farther out.
Another line of evidence relates to the fact that M dwarfs shine brighter and hotter when they are young, when planets would be forming. Kepler-32 would have been too hot for dust -- a key planet-building ingredient -- to even exist in such close proximity to the star. Previously, other astronomers had determined that the third and fourth planets from the star are not very dense, meaning that they are likely made of volatile compounds such as carbon dioxide, methane, or other ices and gases, the Caltech team says. However, those volatile compounds could not have existed in the hotter zones close to the star.
Finally, the Caltech astronomers discovered that three of the planets have orbits that are related to one another in a very specific way. One planet's orbital period lasts twice as long as another's, and the third planet's lasts three times as long as the latter's. Planets don't fall into this kind of arrangement immediately upon forming, Johnson says. Instead, the planets must have started their orbits farther away from the star before moving inward over time and settling into their current configuration.
"You look in detail at the architecture of this very special planetary system, and you're forced into saying these planets formed farther out and moved in," Johnson explains.
The implications of a galaxy chock full of planets are far-reaching, the researchers say. "It's really fundamental from an origins standpoint," says Swift, who notes that because M dwarfs shine mainly in infrared light, the stars are invisible to the naked eye. "Kepler has enabled us to look up at the sky and know that there are more planets out there than stars we can see."
In addition to Swift and Johnson, the other authors on the Astrophysical Journal paper are Caltech graduate students Timothy Morton and Benjamin Montet; Caltech postdoc Philip Muirhead; former Caltech postdoc Justin Crepp of the University of Notre Dame; and Caltech alumnus Daniel Fabrycky (BS '03) of the University of Chicago. The title of the paper is, "Characterizing the cool KOIS IV: Kepler-32 as a prototype for the formation of compact planetary systems throughout the galaxy." In addition to using Kepler, the astronomers made observations at the W. M. Keck Observatory and with the Robo-AO system at Palomar Observatory. Support for all of the telescopes was provided by the W. M. Keck Foundation, NASA, Caltech, the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, the National Science Foundation, the Mt. Cuba Astronomical Foundation, and Samuel Oschin.
Articles on the same topic
- Earth-size planets common in galaxyTue, 8 Jan 2013, 13:37:58 EST
- 15 new planets hint at 'traffic jam' of moons in habitable zoneMon, 7 Jan 2013, 10:33:00 EST
- Amateur Astronomers Discover 42 Alien Planetsfrom Space.comFri, 11 Jan 2013, 14:30:29 EST
- Most Earth-Like Alien Planet Possibly Foundfrom Live ScienceThu, 10 Jan 2013, 0:31:20 EST
- Most Earth-Like Alien Planet Possibly Foundfrom Space.comWed, 9 Jan 2013, 17:00:29 EST
- Alien Earth: What it will mean to find our planet's twinfrom CBSNews - ScienceWed, 9 Jan 2013, 15:00:20 EST
- Alien Earth: What It Will Mean to Find Our Planet's Twinfrom Live ScienceWed, 9 Jan 2013, 11:30:47 EST
- Alien Earth: What It Will Mean to Find Our Planet's Twinfrom Space.comWed, 9 Jan 2013, 8:00:27 EST
- 2,740 new candidate planets have been discovered: get the full listfrom The Guardian - ScienceTue, 8 Jan 2013, 14:00:29 EST
- Earth-size planets common in galaxy: Perhaps 17 percent of sun-like stars have Earth-size planets within the orbit of Mercuryfrom Science DailyTue, 8 Jan 2013, 13:31:09 EST
- Search for Earth’s twin shows promisefrom Harvard ScienceTue, 8 Jan 2013, 11:10:18 EST
- Kepler mission discovers 461 new planet candidatesfrom PhysorgTue, 8 Jan 2013, 11:00:46 EST
- Billions of Earth ‘twins’ may exist in Milky wayfrom CBC: Technology & ScienceTue, 8 Jan 2013, 11:00:23 EST
- Kepler satellite: astronomers may have discovered 461 new planetsfrom The Guardian - ScienceTue, 8 Jan 2013, 8:00:34 EST
- Earth-size planets 'number 17bn'from BBC News: Science & NatureTue, 8 Jan 2013, 2:30:33 EST
- NASA Finds 461 Alien Planet Candidates, Some Possibly Habitablefrom Live ScienceMon, 7 Jan 2013, 19:30:27 EST
- Billions of Earthlike Planets Found in Milky Wayfrom National GeographicMon, 7 Jan 2013, 19:00:39 EST
- NASA's Kepler gets a little help from its friends: Kepler's follow-up observers confirm new discoveriesfrom Science DailyMon, 7 Jan 2013, 18:00:53 EST
- NASA's Kepler telescope finds 461 potential new planetsfrom Reuters:ScienceMon, 7 Jan 2013, 17:50:12 EST
- At least one in six stars has an Earth-sized planet, analysis findsfrom Science DailyMon, 7 Jan 2013, 16:31:24 EST
- Study: At least one in six stars has an Earth-sized planetfrom PhysorgMon, 7 Jan 2013, 16:01:23 EST
- NASA Finds 461 Alien Planet Candidates, Some Possibly Habitablefrom Space.comMon, 7 Jan 2013, 16:00:39 EST
- 17 Billion Earths of the Milky Way Explained (Infographic)from Space.comMon, 7 Jan 2013, 16:00:38 EST
- 17 Billion Earth-Size Alien Planets Inhabit Milky Wayfrom Live ScienceMon, 7 Jan 2013, 15:30:27 EST
- NASA's Kepler discovers 461 new planet candidatesfrom Science DailyMon, 7 Jan 2013, 15:00:35 EST
- Billions And Billions: Our Galaxy Has At Least 100 Billion Planets, Of Which 17 Billion Are Earthlikefrom PopSciMon, 7 Jan 2013, 15:00:22 EST
- Milky Way has at least 17 billion Earth-size planetsfrom CBC: Technology & ScienceMon, 7 Jan 2013, 14:30:19 EST
- NASA's Kepler Discovers 461 New Planet Candidatesfrom NASA Jet Propulsion LaboratoryMon, 7 Jan 2013, 14:00:48 EST
- 17 Billion Earth-Size Alien Planets Inhabit Milky Wayfrom Space.comMon, 7 Jan 2013, 14:00:22 EST
- Milky Way holds over 100 billion planetsfrom CBSNews - ScienceMon, 7 Jan 2013, 12:30:50 EST
- Fifteen new planets hint at 'traffic jam' of moons in habitable zonefrom Science DailyMon, 7 Jan 2013, 10:31:13 EST
- 15 new planets hint at ‘traffic jam’ of moons in habitable zonefrom Science BlogMon, 7 Jan 2013, 10:30:22 EST
- 15 new planets hint at 'traffic jam' of moons in habitable zonefrom PhysorgMon, 7 Jan 2013, 10:00:40 EST
- 100 Billion Alien Planetsfrom Space.comFri, 4 Jan 2013, 13:30:19 EST
- Estimate puts at least 100 billion planets in galaxyfrom Science BlogThu, 3 Jan 2013, 18:30:20 EST
- Milky Way may have 100 billion planetsfrom UPIThu, 3 Jan 2013, 17:30:20 EST
- Planets abound: Astronomers estimate that at least 100 billion planets populate the galaxyfrom Science DailyThu, 3 Jan 2013, 15:00:27 EST
- Billions and Billions of Planetsfrom NASA Jet Propulsion LaboratoryThu, 3 Jan 2013, 13:20:20 EST
- Planets abound: Astronomers estimate that at least 100 billion planets populate the galaxyfrom PhysorgThu, 3 Jan 2013, 6:20:56 EST
- 100 Billion Alien Planets Fill Our Milky Way Galaxy: Studyfrom Live ScienceWed, 2 Jan 2013, 23:00:27 EST
- 100 Billion Alien Planets Fill Our Milky Way Galaxy: Studyfrom Space.comWed, 2 Jan 2013, 16:00:27 EST