Minorities less likely to know about breast cancer treatment options
Nearly half of women treated for breast cancer did not know that their odds of being alive after five years are roughly the same whether they undergo mastectomy or breast conserving surgery. Minority women were even less likely to be aware of this important factor of their treatment decision, according to a study from the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. Minority women were also less likely to know about relative survival rates even when researchers considered factors such as the surgeon's experience, the type of hospital, and whether patients reported talking to their surgeon about treatment options.
"These factors traditionally associated with quality care were not associated with informed decision-making or with our knowledge measures. Surgeon volume or treatment setting did not affect whether women had good knowledge of their treatment options after they had been through the process, nor did it really mediate the racial and ethnic differences we found," says study author Sarah Hawley, Ph.D., a research investigator at the U-M Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Results of the study appear in the August issue of Health Services Research.
The researchers surveyed 1,132 breast cancer patients and asked them whether the chances of being alive five years after surgery were the same after a mastectomy or after lumpectomy with radiation, and whether the chance of breast cancer coming back after treatment was the same for the two surgeries.
Overall, only 51 percent responded correctly to the survival question, but the numbers varied significantly for minorities: 57 percent of whites answered correctly, 34 percent of African-Americans knew their survival odds, and 37 percent of Latinas did.
The researchers found similar results for the recurrence question. Overall, 48 percent said they did not know the answer to the recurrence question, with African-Americans and Latinas significantly more likely to answer "don't know." Research shows that both survival and recurrence are about the same for both surgical options.
Researchers then looked at whether the women were treated by a general surgeon or one who specializes in breast cancer procedures, as well as whether the woman was treated at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center or in a community hospital setting.
They found that even when factoring these points in, minority women still were less likely to be knowledgeable about survival.
"It's important for women to be able to do what we call a high-quality decision-making process. That would mean that the decision needs to be well-informed, based on an accurate knowledge of the risks and benefits of the options, and it also needs to be based on their preferences. If women do not make an informed decision, they're more likely to be dissatisfied down the road with the treatment they received," Hawley says.
The researchers did find, however, that patients who said their surgeon described both treatment options more often had adequate knowledge. The findings indicate that not all patients are clearly understanding information their surgeons may be telling them. The researchers urge surgeons to make sure they communicate information about treatment options, including survival and recurrence risks, during the initial visit in a way that is culturally and ethnically appropriate.
The researchers also urge patients to be aware of their treatment options. "Be sure to ask questions of your surgeon and consider exploring other avenues for getting information," Hawley says.
Breast cancer statistics: 184,450 Americans will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year and 40,930 will die from the disease, according to the American Cancer Society
Methodology: The researchers surveyed 1,132 women recently diagnosed with breast cancer in the Detroit and Los Angeles metropolitan areas. Information was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Registry, a database maintained by the National Cancer Institute that collects information about cancer incidence, treatment and mortality. Patients were matched to 277 surgeons, who were also surveyed. About 73 percent of the women were white, 18 percent were African-American and 9 percent were Latino or other ethnicity.
Source: University of Michigan Health System
Related
- UB study explores how women make decisions about breast cancer surgeryMon, 26 Oct 2009, 16:18:59 EDT
- Study suggests mastectomy not being overused for breast cancer treatmentTue, 13 Oct 2009, 11:42:30 EDT
- Breast asymmetry after cancer treatment affects quality of life, U-M study findsTue, 8 Jul 2008, 18:21:54 EDT
- Latinas more likely to regret breast cancer treatment decisionsTue, 18 Nov 2008, 9:23:29 EST
- Second lumpectomy for breast cancer reduces survival ratesThu, 2 Oct 2008, 15:14:43 EDT
Articles on the same topic
- Hip bone density helps predict breast cancer riskMon, 28 Jul 2008, 0:22:09 EDT
- Hip bone density helps predict breast cancer riskMon, 28 Jul 2008, 0:22:06 EDT
- No need for gene screens in breast cancer familiesTue, 22 Jul 2008, 19:21:54 EDT
- New breast cancer test under studyTue, 22 Jul 2008, 15:14:35 EDT
Other sources
- Minorities less likely to know about breast cancer treatment optionsfrom Science CentricThu, 31 Jul 2008, 11:49:09 EDT
- Minorities Less Likely To Know About Breast Cancer Treatment Optionsfrom Science DailyWed, 30 Jul 2008, 23:21:26 EDT
- Minorities less likely to know about breast cancer treatment optionsfrom PhysorgWed, 30 Jul 2008, 10:56:11 EDT
- Bone density level may act as predictor of breast cancerfrom CBC: HealthMon, 28 Jul 2008, 12:07:15 EDT
- Hip Bone Density Helps Predict Breast Cancer Riskfrom Science DailyMon, 28 Jul 2008, 9:21:32 EDT
- Measuring woman's bone mineral density can help predict breast cancer riskfrom Science CentricMon, 28 Jul 2008, 7:07:08 EDT
- Balance in the Bonesfrom Scientific BloggingFri, 25 Jul 2008, 18:35:12 EDT
- Hip Bone Density Helps Predict Breast Cancer Riskfrom PhysorgFri, 25 Jul 2008, 15:21:18 EDT
- No Need For Gene Screens In Breast Cancer Families, Study Showsfrom Science DailyThu, 24 Jul 2008, 20:35:14 EDT
- No need for gene screens in breast cancer familiesfrom Science CentricWed, 23 Jul 2008, 12:42:11 EDT
- No need for gene screens in breast cancer familiesfrom PhysorgWed, 23 Jul 2008, 5:49:15 EDT
- New breast cancer test under studyfrom PhysorgTue, 22 Jul 2008, 15:14:04 EDT
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox!Learn more about
Popular science news articles
- Elsevier celebrates the 20th anniversary of the UN Convention for the Rights of the Child
- Chest ultrasound as useful as chest CT in the eval of pediatric patients with complicated pneumonia
- Simple blood test could reduce repeat breast MRI scans in premenopausal women with irregular periods
- Milestone biodefense publication by Elsevier journal Vaccine
- ESC to give talks on diabetes in 3 cities in China
- NIST demonstrates 'universal' programmable quantum processor
- Transcendental Meditation helped heart disease patients lower cardiac disease risks by 50 percent
- Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice
- Boehringer Ingelheim announces Phase III data of flibanserin in pre-menopausal women with HSDD
- Heart disease found in Egyptian mummies
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- 1 shot of gene therapy and children with congenital blindness can now see
- Scientists discover influenza's Achilles heel: Antioxidants
- Cleanliness is next to godliness: New research shows clean smells promote moral behavior
- New evidence that dark chocolate helps ease emotional stress
No popular news yet
- Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice
- Treatment with folic acid, vitamin B12 associated with increased risk of cancer, death
- New study links vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular disease and death
- Continuous chest compression-CPR improved cardiac arrest survival in Arizona
- Largest gene study of childhood IBD identifies 5 new genes