High-dose radiation improves lung cancer survival, U-M study finds
Higher doses of radiation combined with chemotherapy improve survival in patients with stage III lung cancer, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. Standard treatment for this stage of lung cancer – when the tumor is likely too large to be removed through surgery – involves a combination of radiation therapy with chemotherapy. But, this new study finds, giving chemotherapy at the same time as the radiation enhances the effect of both. Further, increasing the dose of radiation over the course of treatment also increased survival.
"When patients are diagnosed with stage III lung cancer, surgery is often not an option, and survival rates are typically quite low. Finding new ways to improve survival, even in small increments, is crucial," says senior study author Feng-Ming Kong, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of radiation oncology at the U-M Medical School and chief of radiation oncology at the Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System.
The study, published in the April 1 issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, looked at 237 patients who had been treated for stage III non-small cell lung cancer at U-M and the VA Ann Arbor.
The researchers compared survival among patients treated with radiation alone, with radiation followed by chemotherapy, and with radiation and chemotherapy given at the same time. Thirty-one of the patients were also enrolled in a study in which the radiation dose was increased throughout the course of the treatment.
Patients treated with radiation alone had the worst overall survival rates, living only an average 7.4 months after diagnosis. Adding chemotherapy increased survival to 14.9 months when it was administered after completing radiation and 15.8 months when administered at the same time as radiation. After five years, 19.4 percent of the patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were still alive, compared to only 7.5 percent of patients receiving sequential chemotherapy.
"Our study shows chemotherapy helps, and high dose radiation helps. But it's challenging to administer these treatments at the same time because of the potential toxicity associated with the high dose radiation," Kong says.
U-M researchers are currently looking at using PET imaging during the course of lung cancer treatment to personalize high dose radiation therapy in many individual patients. As the tumor becomes smaller during treatment, increasing the radiation dose will become more tolerable because it is targeting a smaller area. The U-M researchers believe this strategy could lead to improved treatment outcomes in many patients. Kong currently leads a clinical trial that is following patients through their treatment to look at the impact on survival of increasing radiation dose.
Source: University of Michigan Health System
Related
- JNCI news brief: Thalidomide does not improve survival in small cell lung cancerThu, 16 Jul 2009, 16:38:48 EDT
- Vandetanib shows clinical benefit when combined with docetaxel for lung cancerMon, 1 Jun 2009, 9:44:28 EDT
- Chemotherapy plus targeted therapies shows improved survival in advance-stage lung cancer patientsThu, 13 Nov 2008, 10:51:01 EST
- Tissue analyses indicate survival benefits for some lung cancer patientsThu, 13 Nov 2008, 10:51:06 EST
- HPV linked to better survival in tonsil, tongue cancer, U-M study findsTue, 13 May 2008, 6:07:16 EDT
Articles on the same topic
- More intensive treatment not associated with better outcomes in early bladder cancerTue, 7 Apr 2009, 16:50:28 EDT
- More intense bladder cancer treatment does not improve survival, U-M study findsTue, 7 Apr 2009, 16:50:27 EDT
Other sources
- More may not be better for bladder cancer: studyfrom Reuters:ScienceWed, 8 Apr 2009, 13:21:14 EDT
- High-dose radiation improves lung cancer survivalfrom Science CentricWed, 8 Apr 2009, 12:49:29 EDT
- High-dose radiation improves lung cancer survivalfrom PhysorgWed, 8 Apr 2009, 11:49:44 EDT
- High-dose radiation improves lung cancer survival, U-M study findsfrom Science BlogWed, 8 Apr 2009, 10:42:12 EDT
- More intensive treatment not associated with better outcomes in early bladder cancerfrom Science CentricWed, 8 Apr 2009, 8:56:35 EDT
- More intense bladder cancer treatment does not improve survivalfrom Science CentricWed, 8 Apr 2009, 8:21:40 EDT
- More intense bladder cancer treatment does not improve survivalfrom PhysorgTue, 7 Apr 2009, 18:21:14 EDT
- More intense bladder cancer treatment does not improve survival, U-M study findsfrom Science BlogTue, 7 Apr 2009, 16:49:24 EDT
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox!Learn more about
Popular science news articles
- Transcendental Meditation helped heart disease patients lower cardiac disease risks by 50 percent
- Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice
- Boehringer Ingelheim announces Phase III data of flibanserin in pre-menopausal women with HSDD
- Heart disease found in Egyptian mummies
- Therapy 32 times more cost effective at increasing happiness than money
No popular news yet
- Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice
- Treatment with folic acid, vitamin B12 associated with increased risk of cancer, death
- New study links vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular disease and death
- Therapy 32 times more cost effective at increasing happiness than money
- 5 exercises can reduce neck, shoulder pain of women office workers