Electing - rather than appointing - state court judges has drawbacks, study finds

Wednesday, August 8, 2012 - 17:00 in Psychology & Sociology

In traditional economic thought, competition is always good, and just as it's good for the economy, competitive elections should also make things better. But elections of public officials such as judges may have serious drawbacks. In the case of state court judges, for example, elected judges are far more variable in their sentencing than appointed judges, according to a new study.

Read the whole article on Physorg

More from Physorg

Learn more about

Latest Science Newsletter

Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox! It's free!

Check out our next project, Biology.Net