Second-hand smoke toxicity in cars: Myth into fact
There is no evidence to support the fact that smoking in cars is 23 times more toxic than in other indoor environments, states an analysis article in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) (pre-embargo link only) http://www.cmaj.ca/embargo/cmaj090993.pdf. The article, by Australian researchers, describes how a local media report of an unsourced statistic — that "second-hand smoke was "23 times more toxic in a vehicle than in a home"" — led to widespread reporting of the figure in international media and peer-reviewed literature.
However, there appears to be no scientific evidence to support this claim. "In a subsequent exhaustive search of the relevant literature, we failed to locate any scientific source for this comparison," write Mr. Ross MacKenzie, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia and coauthor. "Given that the issue of banning smoking in cars is gaining traction internationally, use of this media-friendly tobacco control 'fact' presents potential problems of credibility."
The 23 times estimate has evolved from being a brief quotation in a US newspaper to entering the academic mainstream in 1998 when a Tobacco Control editorial closely copied the previous quote. Both the newspaper report and the editorial were then cited in an issue of Nicotine and Tobacco Research.
"The biggest danger of inaccurately interpreting research on smoking in cars for the sake of a snappy media sound bite is to lose favour with an overwhelmingly supportive public and to provide ammunition for opponents of tobacco control," write the authors.
The authors conclude that researchers and organizations should stop using the 23 times more toxic "fact" because of the lack of evidence in scientific literature. "Instead, advocating of smoking bans in cars should simply state that exposure to second-hand smoke in cars poses a significant health risk and that vulnerable children who cannot remove themselves from this smoky environment must be protected."
- Risks associated with secondhand smoke in cars carrying childrenMon, 10 Jan 2011, 13:09:25 EST
- Harm-reduction cigarettes are more toxic than traditional cigarettes, UC Riverside study findsMon, 8 Dec 2008, 16:31:28 EST
- Growing evidence of marijuana smoke's potential dangersWed, 5 Aug 2009, 12:31:32 EDT
- Third-hand smoke: Another reason to quit smokingMon, 29 Dec 2008, 12:28:36 EST
- Bars, restaurants see no significant employment change under smoking bans in 2 citiesTue, 29 Jun 2010, 14:22:18 EDT
- Second-hand smoke toxicity in cars: Myth into factfrom Science CentricTue, 13 Apr 2010, 8:01:03 EDT
- Researchers Criticize Secondhand Smoke Hypefrom Scientific BloggingMon, 12 Apr 2010, 17:50:17 EDT
- Second-hand smoke toxicity in cars: Myth into factfrom PhysorgMon, 12 Apr 2010, 14:42:19 EDT
Latest Science NewsletterGet the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox! It's free!
Learn more about
Check out our next project, Biology.Net
From other science news sites
Popular science news articles
- Which qubit my dear? New method to distinguish between neighbouring quantum bits
- Chemical probe confirms that body makes its own rotten egg gas, H2S, to benefit health
- Exposure to high pollution levels during pregnancy may increase risk of having child with autism
- IQ link to baby's weight gain in first month
- Personality test finds some mouse lemurs shy, others bold
- Even with defects, graphene is strongest material in the world
- Detection of the cosmic gamma ray horizon: Measures all the light in the universe since the Big Bang
- Genetic engineering alters mosquitoes' sense of smell
- Allosaurus fed more like a falcon than a crocodile, new study finds
- 'Popcorn' particle pathways promise better lithium-ion batteries