How your brain reacts to mistakes depends on your mindset
"Whether you think you can or think you can't -- you're right," said Henry Ford. A new study, to be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that people who think they can learn from their mistakes have a different brain reaction to mistakes than people who think intelligence is fixed. "One big difference between people who think intelligence is malleable and those who think intelligence is fixed is how they respond to mistakes," says Jason S. Moser, of Michigan State University, who collaborated on the new study with Hans S. Schroder, Carrie Heeter, Tim P. Moran, and Yu-Hao Lee. Studies have found that people who think intelligence is malleable say things like, "When the going gets tough, I put in more effort" or "If I make a mistake, I try to learn and figure it out." On the other hand, people who think that they can't get smarter will not take opportunities to learn from their mistakes. This can be a problem in school, for example; a student who thinks her intelligence is fixed will think it's not worth bothering to try harder after she fails a test.
For this study, Moser and his colleagues gave participants a task that is easy to make a mistake on. They were supposed to identify the middle letter of a five-letter series like "MMMMM" or "NNMNN." Sometimes the middle letter was the same as the other four, and sometimes it was different. "It's pretty simple, doing the same thing over and over, but the mind can't help it; it just kind of zones out from time to time," Moser says. That's when people make mistakes -- and they notice it immediately, and feel stupid.
While doing the task, the participant wore a cap on his or her head that records electrical activity in the brain. When someone makes a mistake, their brain makes two quick signals: an initial response that indicates something has gone awry -- Moser calls it the "'oh crap' response" -- and a second that indicates the person is consciously aware of the mistake and is trying to right the wrong. Both signals occur within a quarter of a second of the mistake. After the experiment, the researchers found out whether people believed they could learn from their mistakes or not.
People who think they can learn from their mistakes did better after making a mistake -- in other words, they successfully bounced back after an error. Their brains also reacted differently, producing a bigger second signal, the one that says "I see that I've made a mistake, so I should pay more attention" Moser says.
The research shows that these people are different on a fundamental level, Moser says. "This might help us understand why exactly the two types of individuals show different behaviors after mistakes." People who think they can learn from their mistakes have brains that are tuned to pay more attention to mistakes, he says. This research could help in training people to believe that they can work harder and learn more, by showing how their brain is reacting to mistakes.
Recommend this story on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google +1:
Source: Association for Psychological Science
Related
- Distract yourself or think it over? 2 ways to deal with negative emotionsTue, 5 Jul 2011, 20:36:02 EDT
- Taking another look at the roots of social psychologyWed, 18 Jan 2012, 22:31:54 EST
- Four-year-olds know that being right is not enoughThu, 18 Aug 2011, 22:39:19 EDT
- Time and numbers mix together in the brainTue, 19 Jul 2011, 22:34:13 EDT
- The brain acts fast to reappraise angry facesTue, 15 Nov 2011, 19:33:39 EST
Other sources
- Study: Some learn better from mistakesfrom UPIMon, 3 Oct 2011, 21:30:35 EDT
- Study: Some learn better from mistakesfrom UPIMon, 3 Oct 2011, 21:00:47 EDT
- How your brain reacts to mistakes depends on your mindsetfrom Science DailyFri, 30 Sep 2011, 21:30:21 EDT
- How your brain reacts to mistakes depends on your mindsetfrom PhysorgFri, 30 Sep 2011, 6:30:35 EDT
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox! It's free!Learn more about
Check out our next project, Biology.Net
Popular science news articles
- Organic carbon from Mars, but not biological
- Autopsy of a eruption: Linking crystal growth to volcano seismicity
- Nanoparticles seen as artificial atoms
- Relatively speaking: Researchers identify principles that shape kinship categories across languages
- Nuisance seaweed found to produce compounds with biomedical potential
- Good news for nanomedicine: Quantum dots appear safe in pioneering study on primates
- Taking solar technology up a notch
- El Niño weather and climate change threaten survival of baby leatherback sea turtles
- Using graphene, scientists develop a less toxic way to rust-proof steel
- Deep sea animals stowaway on submarines and reach new territory
- Good news for nanomedicine: Quantum dots appear safe in pioneering study on primates
- Pacific islands may become refuge for corals in a warming climate, study finds
- In metallic glasses, researchers find a few new atomic structures
- New graphene-based material could revolutionize electronics industry
- UCLA researchers map damaged connections in Phineas Gage's brain
- Modern dog breeds genetically disconnected from ancient ancestors
- Good news for nanomedicine: Quantum dots appear safe in pioneering study on primates
- Calcium supplements linked to significantly increased heart attack risk
- New study examines relationship between social status and wound healing in wild baboons
- New silicon memory chip developed
- Italian merchants funded England's discovery of North America
- New graphene-based material could revolutionize electronics industry
- Babies' brains benefit from music lessons, researchers find
- Happiness model developed by MU researcher could help people go from good to great
- UCLA researchers map damaged connections in Phineas Gage's brain