Cat-calls are detrimental to everyone
For every woman who is a direct target of sexism, there are others who witness the event and are also affected. The actions of one sexist man affect how female bystanders feel and behave towards men in general. Stephenie Chaudoir and Diane Quinn, from the University of Connecticut in the US, publish their work1 on the effects of bystander sexism and group-level reactions to sexism in Springer's journal Sex Roles. Women are often bystanders to sexist remarks directed at other women. Research shows that women often experience a variety of negative emotions when they are the targets of sexism and other women who witness the derogatory remark can also be affected. Sexism also has the potential to shape how women think, feel and behave towards men in general.
Chaudoir and Quinn examined women's reactions to overhearing a catcall remark and, in particular, how observing a specific sexist incident impacts women's feelings and attitudes towards men. They asked 114 undergraduate female students to watch a video and imagine themselves as bystanders to a situation where a man made either a sexist catcall remark ("Hey Kelly, your boobs look great in that shirt!") at another woman or simply greeted her ("Hey Kelly, what's up?"). The researchers then asked the students to rate their anxiety, depression and hostility levels, their anger and fear towards men, how prejudiced they thought the comment was, their desire to move against or away from men in general, as well as how strongly they felt about their gender identity as a result of witnessing the sexist remark.
The analyses showed that women were more likely to think about themselves in terms of their gender group identity and, as a result, feel greater anger and motivation to take direct action towards men, in general, when they are bystanders to sexism. In other words, they experienced emotions and motivations in line with how the situation may help or harm women as a whole, rather than how it might affect them personally as individuals.
Chaudoir and Quinn's work highlights how men and women in general are implicated in individual instances of sexism and that sexism is bad for everyone.
They conclude: "Women are obviously implicated because they suffer direct negative consequences as targets of prejudice and, as the current work demonstrates, indirect consequences as bystanders. But sexism also harms men as well. Whenever a single man's prejudiced actions are attributed to his gender identity, male perpetrators impact how women view and react to men more generally."
Source: Springer
Related
- U of T research suggests female minorities are more affected by racism than sexismTue, 12 Jul 2011, 2:33:27 EDT
- Daily acts of sexism go unnoticed by men, womenMon, 13 Jun 2011, 14:32:41 EDT
- Confronting sexism may be 'antidote' for workplace distressMon, 29 Nov 2010, 10:33:59 EST
- Culture affects how teen girls see harassmentThu, 15 May 2008, 0:28:58 EDT
- Sexism and gender inequalitySun, 30 Oct 2011, 16:33:39 EDT
Other sources
- Cat-calls are detrimental to everyonefrom Science CentricFri, 19 Mar 2010, 11:30:31 EDT
- 'Bystander Sexism' Affects How Women Think Of Menfrom Scientific BloggingThu, 18 Mar 2010, 12:07:17 EDT
- Cat-calls are detrimental to everyonefrom PhysorgThu, 18 Mar 2010, 10:36:42 EDT
- Sexism: Cat-calls are detrimental to everyonefrom Science DailyThu, 18 Mar 2010, 10:36:08 EDT
- Cat-calls are detrimental to everyonefrom Science BlogThu, 18 Mar 2010, 9:50:44 EDT
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox! It's free!Learn more about
Check out our next project, Biology.Net
Popular science news articles
- Taking solar technology up a notch
- El Niño weather and climate change threaten survival of baby leatherback sea turtles
- Deep sea animals stowaway on submarines and reach new territory
- Top 10 new species list draws attention to diverse biosphere
- Calcium supplements linked to significantly increased heart attack risk
- Good news for nanomedicine: Quantum dots appear safe in pioneering study on primates
- Taking solar technology up a notch
- El Niño weather and climate change threaten survival of baby leatherback sea turtles
- Using graphene, scientists develop a less toxic way to rust-proof steel
- Human-like spine morphology found in aquatic eel fossil
- Good news for nanomedicine: Quantum dots appear safe in pioneering study on primates
- Pacific islands may become refuge for corals in a warming climate, study finds
- In metallic glasses, researchers find a few new atomic structures
- New graphene-based material could revolutionize electronics industry
- UCLA researchers map damaged connections in Phineas Gage's brain
- Modern dog breeds genetically disconnected from ancient ancestors
- Good news for nanomedicine: Quantum dots appear safe in pioneering study on primates
- Google goes cancer: Researchers use search engine algorithm to find cancer biomarkers
- New silicon memory chip developed
- Pollution teams with thunderclouds to warm atmosphere
- Italian merchants funded England's discovery of North America
- New graphene-based material could revolutionize electronics industry
- Babies' brains benefit from music lessons, researchers find
- Happiness model developed by MU researcher could help people go from good to great
- UCLA researchers map damaged connections in Phineas Gage's brain