Multiple purchase options? How marketers influence consumer agendas
Making choices is tough, especially in a competitive retail environment. A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research sheds some light on the processes consumers use to make choices among multiple options. To illustrate the phenomenon they investigated, authors Young-Won Ha and Sehoon Park (both Sogang University, Korea), and Hee-Kyung Ahn (University of Toronto) put forth the following scenario: A consumer must decide between two identically priced vacation packages to France. Package A ("the competitor") offers stays at four-star hotels that are inconveniently located. Package B ("the target") includes stays at two-star hotels near famous museums and palaces. As the consumer weighs the difference between service and convenience, she finds a package C ("the decoy"), which offers stays at one-star hotels that are as conveniently located as Package B.
Prior consumer research has clearly demonstrated that the presence of a decoy increases the attractiveness of the target option. More people will choose Package B (the target) when the decoy is available.
In this study, the authors examined the effect of changing one feature in the choice set. For example, if Package A's destination were now Italy instead of France, how would consumers respond? This introduction of Italy into the choices is called a "unique categorical feature."
"When a unique categorical feature (e.g., Italy for a tour site) was introduced in the competitor option, the power of the decoy to enhance the attractiveness of the target (vs. the competitor) was significantly reduced," write the authors. In three separate studies, the authors documented the influence of categorical attributes on the impact of decoys to enhance the attractiveness of the target options. They used vacation tour packages, laptop computers, and camera phones.
The conclusions of the study can help retailers fend off challenges from competitors that offer less-expensive competing brands. Opening their own stores (Haagen-Dazs, Nike) is one way to control competitive factors. "There are many other creative ways to set consumers' choice agendas based on categorical attributes," the authors conclude.
Source: University of Chicago Press Journals
Related
- Filling in the blanks: Consumers want complete information to make choicesTue, 14 Oct 2008, 13:22:08 EDT
- Too many choices can spoil the researchWed, 25 Jun 2008, 16:21:53 EDT
- Advil or Excedrin? New model helps predict product choicesFri, 30 May 2008, 13:21:52 EDT
- Categories help us make happier choicesWed, 16 Jul 2008, 21:29:13 EDT
- What are you getting? Consumer behavior in restaurantsMon, 21 Sep 2009, 16:57:52 EDT
Other sources
- Multiple purchase options? How marketers influence consumer agendasfrom PhysorgMon, 20 Apr 2009, 16:21:12 EDT
- Multiple purchase options? How marketers influence consumer agendasfrom Science BlogMon, 20 Apr 2009, 15:49:07 EDT
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox!Learn more about
Popular science news articles
No popular news yet
- Beyond sunlight: Explorers census 17,650 ocean species between edge of darkness and black abyss
- New hydrogen-storage method discovered
- Is global warming unstoppable?
- Supervolcano eruption -- in Sumatra -- deforested India 73,000 years ago
- First black holes may have incubated in giant, starlike cocoons, says CU-Boulder study
No popular news yet
- Beyond sunlight: Explorers census 17,650 ocean species between edge of darkness and black abyss
- Implant-based cancer vaccine is first to eliminate tumors in mice
- Surface bacteria maintain skin's healthy balance
- Is global warming unstoppable?
- Polyphenols and polyunsaturated fatty acids boost the birth of new neurons
- New evidence that dark chocolate helps ease emotional stress
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice
- New study links vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular disease and death
- Therapy 32 times more cost effective at increasing happiness than money