Natural selection is not the only process that drives evolution
Why have some of our genes evolved rapidly? It is widely believed that Darwinian natural selection is responsible, but research led by a group at Uppsala University, suggests that a separate neutral (nonadaptive) process has made a significant contribution to human evolution. Their results have been published today in the journal PLoS Biology. The researchers identified fast evolving human genes by comparing our genome with those of other primates. However, surprisingly, the patterns of molecular evolution in many of the genes they found did not contain signals of natural selection. Instead, their evidence suggests that a separate process known as BGC (biased gene conversion) has speeded up the rate of evolution in certain genes. This process increases the rate at which certain mutations spread through a population, regardless of whether they are beneficial or harmful.
"The research not only increases our understanding of human evolution, but also suggests that many techniques used by evolutionary biologists to detect selection may be flawed" says Matthew Webster
BGC is thought to be strongest in regions of high recombination, and can cause harmful mutations can spread through populations. The results lead to the provocative hypothesis that, rather than being the result of Darwinian selection for new adaptations, many of the genetic changes leading to human-specific characters may be the result of the fixation of harmful mutations. This contrasts the traditional Darwinistic view that they are the result of natural selection in favour of adaptive mutations.
Source: Uppsala University
Related
- There's a speed limit to the pace of evolution, Penn biologists sayMon, 2 Nov 2009, 14:16:04 EST
- New research shows how gene function drives natural selection in important class of genetic elementsWed, 10 Dec 2008, 11:51:02 EST
- Stanford researchers show adaptation plays a significant role in human evolutionFri, 16 Jan 2009, 9:51:05 EST
- Are humans still evolving? Absolutely, says a new analysis of a long-term survey of human healthMon, 19 Oct 2009, 15:50:06 EDT
- Time in a bottle: Scientists watch evolution unfoldSun, 18 Oct 2009, 13:52:46 EDT
Other sources
- Natural Selection Not The Only Process That Drives Evolution?from Science DailyTue, 27 Jan 2009, 20:42:33 EST
- Natural selection is not the only process that drives evolutionfrom Science CentricTue, 27 Jan 2009, 12:00:33 EST
- Natural selection is not the only process that drives evolutionfrom PhysorgTue, 27 Jan 2009, 4:35:16 EST
- Biased Gene Conversion Deserves Some Credit In Evolution Too, Say Researchersfrom Scientific BloggingMon, 26 Jan 2009, 21:35:15 EST
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox!Popular science news articles
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- Scientists discover influenza's Achilles heel: Antioxidants
- New evidence that dark chocolate helps ease emotional stress
- Why nice guys usually get the girls
- Beyond sunlight: Explorers census 17,650 ocean species between edge of darkness and black abyss
- Beyond sunlight: Explorers census 17,650 ocean species between edge of darkness and black abyss
- Surface bacteria maintain skin's healthy balance
- Is global warming unstoppable?
- Polyphenols and polyunsaturated fatty acids boost the birth of new neurons
- Implant-based cancer vaccine is first to eliminate tumors in mice
- New evidence that dark chocolate helps ease emotional stress
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- Scientists discover influenza's Achilles heel: Antioxidants
- Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice
- New study links vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular disease and death