Interpretation time for screening digital mammograms: Is it efficient?
Digital mammograms take longer to interpret than film-screen mammograms, according to a study performed at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. The study included four radiologists who interpreted 268 digital screening mammograms and 189 film-screening mammograms. "The average interpretation time for all of our readers was 240 seconds (4 minutes) for digital screening mammograms and 127 seconds (2 minutes, 7 seconds) for film-screen screening mammograms," said Tamara Miner Haygood, MD, lead author of the study. "The digital screening mammograms took nearly twice as long to interpret as the film-screen screening mammograms," said Dr. Haygood.
The study identified factors that might have contributed to the difference in time. "Those factors were the identity of the interpreting radiologist, whether there were older studies available for comparison, whether the radiologist looked for and hung up additional films, how many images were obtained and whether the study was normal or not. In each of these situations, the digital images took longer to interpret than the film-screen images," said Dr. Haygood.
"As a result of this study, radiologists should be able to make a more informed choice about whether digital of film-screen mammograms are right for their practice, and if they choose digital screening mammograms, they will have a better idea of how much time to allow for reading them," said Dr. Haygood.
"Digital screening mammograms offer an improvement in diagnostic accuracy compared with film-screen screening mammograms and they have other advantages such as improved ease of storage and retrieval," said Dr. Haygood. It will be very beneficial if manufacturers of digital equipment, in cooperation with radiologists, can improve equipment and reading techniques to bring interpretation speed for digital mammograms closer to interpretation speed for film-screen mammograms," she added.
Source: American Roentgen Ray Society
Related
- Mammography facility characteristics associated with accuracy of screeningTue, 10 Jun 2008, 16:49:50 EDT
- A break from hormone therapy doesn't improve mammogramsMon, 1 Jun 2009, 17:29:18 EDT
- Digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis may decrease patient recall ratesWed, 5 Aug 2009, 10:29:37 EDT
- Researchers believe hormone therapy should not be stopped prior to mammogramsMon, 28 Sep 2009, 10:50:43 EDT
- Surgical gel used to stop bleeding could confuse mammogramsTue, 14 Apr 2009, 17:57:16 EDT
Other sources
- Interpretation time for screening digital mammograms: Is it efficient?from Science CentricWed, 7 Jan 2009, 10:28:27 EST
- Interpretation time for screening digital mammograms: Is it efficient?from PhysorgTue, 6 Jan 2009, 16:35:11 EST
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox!Learn more about
Popular science news articles
No popular news yet
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- Wolves, moose and biodiversity: An unexpected connection
- Does green tea prevent cancer? Evidence continues to brew, but questions remain
- Why nice guys usually get the girls
- Digital 'plaster' for monitoring vital signs undergoes first clinical trials
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- 1 shot of gene therapy and children with congenital blindness can now see
- Scientists discover influenza's Achilles heel: Antioxidants
- Cleanliness is next to godliness: New research shows clean smells promote moral behavior
- How the Moon produces its own water
No popular news yet
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- Study reveals a 'missing link' in immune response to disease
- Common plants can eliminate indoor air pollutants
- Reduction in glycotoxins from heat-processing of foods reduces risk of chronic disease
- Does green tea prevent cancer? Evidence continues to brew, but questions remain