Heart attack not a death sentence
Survivors of cardiac arrest who received intensive care can expect long-term quality of life at reasonable expense to the health care system. Research published today in BioMed Central's open access journal Critical Care is the first to show that the allocation of resources to the treatment of heart attack patients is equally as justified as the treatment of other intensive care patient groups. More than 600,000 people in Europe suffer cardiac arrest each year. Following successful CPR, patients are routinely admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Although ICUs only care for a minority of patients, they consume a large proportion of hospital budgets. The lead author of the study, Juergen Graf from the Philipps-University Marburg, Germany, said, "economic constraints create pressure to ration ICU care. Restricting the demand for futile medical services by limiting access to the ICU, at least for those patients likely to die anyway, has been proposed as a way of lowering expenditures".
In order to investigate this, Graf and his colleagues conducted an assessment of health status of patients five years after discharge from the ICU of Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Aachen, and combined this with a fully costed economic evaluation. Of 354 patients admitted to the ICU with cardiac arrest, 204 died prior to discharge from the hospital. Of the 150 remaining, 40 died before year five, leaving 110 patients (31%) eligible for the survey. The total costs for the ICU treatment of all 354 patients amounted to more than 6.3million euros.
According to Graf, "This is approximately double the cost of an average ICU patient, but it does compare favorably to a variety of other routine interventions such as mechanical ventilation or kidney dialysis". Furthermore, patients who survived cardiac arrest do not necessarily have as bleak a prognosis as is often anticipated. As the authors explain, "The health-related quality of life five years after discharge was only slightly lower than healthy controls of the same age and gender of the patients".
Graf concludes, "Our study is the first to demonstrate that patients who survive cardiac arrest without severe neurological disabilities may expect fair long-term survival and a good quality of life for reasonable expenses to the health care system".
Source: BioMed Central
Related
- ICU follow-up services: What patients really thinkWed, 1 Apr 2009, 8:44:53 EDT
- Penn study: Chances of surviving cardiac arrest depend on where patients are treatedFri, 9 Jan 2009, 10:28:37 EST
- New statement outlines essentials of heart failure clinicsThu, 11 Dec 2008, 11:57:47 EST
- Risk of repeat attacks in heart patients causes concern for doctorsThu, 28 Aug 2008, 9:23:00 EDT
- Emergency treatment strategies, better communication reduce heart attack patient deathsThu, 12 Feb 2009, 15:23:55 EST
Learn more about
Other sources
- Heart attack not a death sentencefrom Science CentricFri, 18 Jul 2008, 9:21:07 EDT
- Heart attack not a death sentencefrom PhysorgFri, 18 Jul 2008, 4:42:13 EDT
Sponsored links
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox!Previous article
Study on government's controversial choice of HPV vaccineBreaking science news
- Climate change and the mystery of the shrinking sheepThu, 2 Jul 2009, 14:31:49 EDT
- Rare sheep could be key to better diagnostic tests in developing world, says Stanford studySat, 4 Jul 2009, 4:22:05 EDT
- 'Jumping gene' diminishes the effect of a new type 2 diabetes risk geneFri, 3 Jul 2009, 3:09:05 EDT
Popular science news articles
- What really prompts the dog's 'guilty look'
- Red giant star Betelgeuse is mysteriously shrinking
- Green tea may affect prostate cancer progression
- Study finds that tobacco companies changed design of cigarettes without alerting smokers
- Got ear plugs? You may want to sport them on the subway and other mass transit, researchers say