Scientists 'bad at judging peers' published work,' says new study

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 - 15:00 in Psychology & Sociology

Are scientists any good at judging the importance of the scientific work of others? According to a new study scientists are unreliable judges of the importance of fellow researchers' published papers.

Read the whole article on Science Daily

More from Science Daily

Latest Science Newsletter

Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox! It's free!

Check out our next project, Biology.Net