Habitable Planet Searches (And Claims) Should Be More Focused

NASA should trademark 'has implications for life on other planets' - every other month there are claims about habitable exoplanets, but they are based on statistical wobbles and it isn't informing the public as well it such claims could because the habitable planet zones are not narrow enough. Instead, we should be taking a more conservative approach to bold assertions - being conservative is the essence of science. And that means looking at habitable zones where life-sustaining planets might exist: planets that have liquid water and solid or liquid surfaces, as opposed to gas giants like Jupiter or Saturn. read more

Read the whole article on

More from