A single 'super' gene can make a dramatic difference to an athlete's performance. But is that fair?Evolution has not acted equally on men and women. This is most clear when it comes to the allocation of genes that control power and strength. The reason for this is not as obvious as it might seem. It is unlikely to be a product of differential hunting requirements. Indeed, in many mammals, it is the females that do the hunting. There seems no reason, apart from cultural, why a woman could not hunt as effectively as a man, whether over a short period or persistently for two days – and of course great apes that only hunt vegetables (gorillas and orangutans) still have males that are considerably more powerful than females. Instead, the selection for strength is most likely a product of males fighting other males in competition for mates.It seems likely that...
- Male lions use ambush hunting strategyMon, 18 Mar 2013, 17:33:51 EDT
- Female athletes injured more than male athletesMon, 25 Jan 2010, 13:17:35 EST
- Despite 'peacenik' reputation, bonobos hunt and eat other primates tooMon, 13 Oct 2008, 12:35:37 EDT
- Team discovers reason that male moths can keep finding femalesTue, 14 Aug 2012, 13:23:27 EDT
- Better looking birds have more help at home with their chicksMon, 25 Jun 2012, 8:02:02 EDT