News stories about neuroscience typically draw conclusions or make predictions well beyond the focus of the original studyA recent article in the journal Neuron analysed how neuroscience stories are typically presented by major UK newspapers. Although diplomatically stated in the paper, the findings do not inspire confidence. To summarise, it seems that when neuroscience findings are covered by the mainstream press, they're invariably interpreted in questionable ways in order to support political ideology or predetermined views and theories, up to and including discriminatory stereotypes - for example about homosexuals.While newspaper stories about neuroscience research usually have some sort of appreciable logic, they typically end up with conclusions or predictions that are well beyond the focus of the original study, and bear little or no resemblance to a scientific critique. (Ironically, the most common category used in what seemed to be an ever increasing flow of misinformation was "Brain optimisation".)The team...
- GU/GUMC researchers present more than 100 scientific abstracts at Neuroscience 2008Wed, 19 Nov 2008, 16:36:27 EST
- Barrow TRPV1 research highlighted in Journal of NeuroscienceTue, 1 Feb 2011, 18:02:45 EST
- Neuroscience 2009 highlights new research on exercise, music and the brainTue, 20 Oct 2009, 9:44:27 EDT
- Cedars-Sinai researchers present new findings at neuroscience meetingsWed, 19 Nov 2008, 10:30:35 EST
- Novel research deconstruct inner workings of the brainTue, 20 Oct 2009, 9:44:35 EDT