Paleontologists in 2005 hailed research that apparently showed that soft, pliable tissues had been recovered from dissolved dinosaur bones, a major finding that would substantially widen the known range of preserved biomolecules. But new research challenges that finding and suggests that the supposed recovered dinosaur tissue is in reality biofilm – or slime. The original research, published in Science magazine, claimed the discovery of blood vessels and what appeared to be entire cells inside fossil bone of a Tyrannosaurus rex. The scientists had dissolved the bone in acid, leaving behind the blood vessel- and cell-like structures. Read More...
- New research challenges notion that dinosaur soft tissues still surviveTue, 29 Jul 2008, 20:35:26 EDT
- Proteins, soft tissue from 80-million-year-old dino support theory that molecules preserve over timeThu, 30 Apr 2009, 14:39:30 EDT
- What did T. rex eat? Each otherFri, 15 Oct 2010, 17:32:27 EDT
- New sequences from hadrosaur dinosaur confirm that ancient protein is preserved over timeThu, 30 Apr 2009, 14:39:33 EDT
- Misplaced metamorphosisTue, 3 Mar 2009, 15:37:20 EST