On Deca And Ethics - Does A Chemical Industry Trade Group Make EPA Personnel Decisions?
In March, the US House Energy and Commerce Committee launched an investigation into potential conflicts of interest in scientific panels that advise the Environmental Protection Agency on the human health effects of toxic chemicals. The committee identified eight scientists that served as consultants or members of EPA science advisory panels while getting research support from the chemical industry to study the chemicals under review. Two scientists were actually employed by companies that made or worked with manufacturers of the chemicals under review. Such conflicts, Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.) noted, stand in stark contrast to the agency’s dismissal last summer of highly respected public health scientist Deborah Rice, an expert in toxicology, from a panel examining the health impacts of the flame retardant deca. The EPA fired Rice after the chemical industry’s trade group, the American Chemistry Council, complained that she could not provide an objective scientific review because she had spoken out about the health hazards posed by deca. read more
Read the whole article on Scientific Blogging
More from Scientific Blogging
Related
- EPA should pursue cumulative risk assessment of phthalates and other chemicalsThu, 18 Dec 2008, 16:43:30 EST
- Why did the EPA fire a respected toxicologist?Tue, 13 May 2008, 9:28:27 EDT
- American Chemical Society's Weekly PressPac -- May 28, 2008Mon, 2 Jun 2008, 12:21:37 EDT
- Catalytic Catamarans: Common industrial catalyst sports rafts made of platinumThu, 24 Sep 2009, 14:26:17 EDT
- Gulf War research panel finds 1 in 4 veterans suffers from illness caused by toxic exposureMon, 17 Nov 2008, 11:49:34 EST