Homo floresiensis feet may help settle a hotly debated question among paleontologists: was this population similar to modern humans, or not? A new research analysis demonstrates that although "hobbits" were bipedal, several features of their feet (such as flat feet) were primitive but not pathological. Furthermore, their gait was not efficient, and the population probably found long term running difficult.
- New analysis shows 'hobbits' couldn't hustleWed, 6 May 2009, 13:36:42 EDT
- Is the Hobbit's brain unfeasibly small?Tue, 26 Jan 2010, 19:37:37 EST
- 'Hobbits' are a new human species -- according to the statistical analysis of fossilsThu, 19 Nov 2009, 5:14:38 EST
- Does evolution always lead to bigger brains?Thu, 28 Jan 2010, 3:46:16 EST
- Blocking the critical structure that lets cancer cells move -- their feetThu, 16 Dec 2010, 10:29:09 EST