Does Hollywood Really Need to Get the Science Right?
Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 13:14
in Psychology & Sociology
You can almost see scientists rubbing their hands (or groaning) whenever a new Hollywood film rolls out, riddled with scientific errors. But one astronomer recently voiced a possibly blasphemous suggestion – maybe it's ok if a movie flubs the facts, as long as it gets the big picture right about science and scientists. Seth Shostak of the SETI Institute comes with his own experience on Hollywood sets, having served as scientific advisor on the 2008 remake of The Day After Tomorrow. His biggest problem wasn't with the alien technology of Klaatu, the extraterrestrial harbinger of doom played by Keanu Reeves. Instead, he fought for the filmmakers to stop showing the scientists as number-crunching stereotypes. read more
Read the whole article on PopSci
More from PopSci
Related
- Scientists give a hand(edness) to the search for alien lifeThu, 23 Apr 2009, 10:30:49 EDT
- Hollywood gets mixed reviews in history class, study suggestsWed, 5 Aug 2009, 17:15:16 EDT
- Tobacco movie industry ties traced to Hollywood's early years in Stanford/UCSF studySat, 27 Sep 2008, 0:29:56 EDT
- Science and media disconnect? Maybe not, says a new studyWed, 9 Sep 2009, 13:18:19 EDT
- Robot scientist becomes first machine to discover new scientific knowledgeThu, 2 Apr 2009, 14:39:55 EDT