ICU infection rates not a good measure of mortality risk
ICU-acquired infection rates are not an indication of patients' mortality risk, according to researchers the University of Pennsylvania, undermining a central tenet of many pay-for-performance initiatives. Public reporting of quality data is increasingly common in health care. These "report cards" are designed to improve the quality of care by helping patients choose the best hospitals. Yet, they only work if they successfully identify high performers, and may be misleading if they steer patients toward poor performers.
The findings will be reported at the ATS*2010 International Conference in New Orleans.
To examine whether or not publicly-reported infection rates actually identify the best hospitals, Kate Courtright, M.D., resident physician at the University of Pennsylvania and colleagues looked at patients in Pennsylvania hospitals especially at risk for two types of infections: pneumonia and blood stream infections. They calculated hospital death rates accounting for differences in illness severity across 158 hospitals, which included nearly 19,000 admissions involving mechanical ventilation and over 16,000 ICU admissions involving central venous catheterization, and compared them to ICU-acquired infection rates obtained from a public state website. They then used rank correlation and linear regression to determine the relationship between infections and death.
"We found that ICU-acquired infection rates as reported on a state website did not correlate with death rates for at-risk patients." said Dr. Courtright, lead author of the abstract. "In fact, hospitals with lower rates of ICU-acquired infection did not also have lower death rates for at-risk patients." For example, the 43 hospitals that reported no cases of ICU-acquired pneumonia had an average death rate of 35.7 percent for patients receiving mechanical ventilation; hospitals with high infection rates (ranging from 1 to 8 cases per 1000 ventilator days) had an average death rate of 34.6 percent. These numbers were not statistically different.
Despite their limitations, Dr. Courtright noted, ICU-acquired infections rates are likely to continue to be a part of hospital report cards.
However, "both policy-makers and the public should recognize that these rates, at least as reported by hospitals, provide limited information about the quality of the hospital, and may misidentify high and low performers," she said. "More comprehensive report cards that report both complications like ICU-acquired infections and overall survival rates are needed to help patients make correct decisions. In the meantime, more care is needed to make sure that hospital report cards don't do more harm than good. This is especially important because under upcoming health care reform, infection rates are also to be used for hospital reimbursement—hospitals with high infection rates will not be reimbursed as well for their care. Such a strategy, known as 'pay-for-performance', may actually penalize good hospitals with low mortality rates."
Research on the efficacy of 'report cards' in predicting mortality rates must be expanded to other states or in a national study, said Dr. Courtright. Additionally, she said, infection rates as reported by the hospitals may be incorrect as they have an incentive to report low infection rates.
"Report cards only work if they successfully identify the best hospitals," concluded Dr. Courtright. "We were surprised to find that many hospitals with good report cards from an infection standpoint are not that good from a more important standpoint—patient survival. Additionally, many hospitals with high infection rates actually had very good survival rates. Using these report cards to choose a hospital may be misleading and potentially harmful."
Source: American Thoracic Society
- Since introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy, HIV death rate has decreasedTue, 1 Jul 2008, 16:49:38 EDT
- UVA reports promising method for reducing MRSA infections in hospitalsThu, 4 Sep 2008, 12:36:42 EDT
- Patient referrals cause differences in hospital infection ratesThu, 18 Mar 2010, 20:43:40 EDT
- Investigational vaccine not effective in reducing post-operative staph infectionsThu, 4 Apr 2013, 20:04:15 EDT
- Hospital infections and multidrug-resistant pathogensThu, 24 Feb 2011, 10:35:55 EST
Articles on the same topic
- Health insurance status linked to mortality risk in PA ICUsMon, 17 May 2010, 18:33:31 EDT
- ICU infection rates not a good measure of mortality riskfrom Science CentricTue, 18 May 2010, 16:40:53 EDT
- Health insurance status linked to mortality risk in PA ICUsfrom Science CentricTue, 18 May 2010, 16:40:25 EDT
- Health insurance status linked to mortality risk in PA ICUsfrom PhysorgMon, 17 May 2010, 20:00:54 EDT
- ICU infection rates not a good measure of mortality riskfrom PhysorgMon, 17 May 2010, 18:30:27 EDT
Latest Science NewsletterGet the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox! It's free!
Check out our next project, Biology.Net
From other science news sites
Popular science news articles
No popular news yet
No popular news yet
- Stem cell transplant restores memory, learning in mice
- Superstorm Sandy shook the US
- 2 landmark studies report on success of using image-guided brachytherapy to treat cervical cancer
- Calculating tsunami risk for the US East Coast
- Researchers discover mushrooms can provide as much vitamin D as supplements