New analysis shows 'hobbits' couldn't hustle
A detailed analysis of the feet of Homo floresiensis—the miniature hominins who lived on a remote island in eastern Indonesia until 18,000 years ago—may help settle a question hotly debated among paleontologists: how similar was this population to modern humans? A new research paper, featured on the cover of the current issue of Nature, may answer this question. While the so-called "hobbits" walked on two legs, several features of their feet were so primitive that their gait was not efficient. "The hobbits were bipedal, but they walked in a different way from modern humans," explains William Harcourt-Smith, a Research Scientist in the Division of Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History and an author on the paper. "Their feet have a combination of human-like and more primitive early hominin traits, some of which are more akin to those in Lucy." Lucy is an early bipedal but small-brained hominin, or australopithecine, that lived in Africa 3.2 million years ago.
The "hobbits," excavated from Liang Bua Cave on the island of Flores, were first described in 2004. Known specimens range in age from 90,000 to 18,000 years old, making them contemporaneous with modern humans. This, in combination with the unusually small stature and brain size of H. floresiensis, led to considerable debate among researchers and in the press. Some consider the population a separate species, while others have assessed the fossils as pathological modern humans. But a number of recent analyses of the skull, face, and wrist have found many unusually primitive features among the "hobbits" that are more similar to chimpanzees and Australopithecus, suggesting that the Flores inhabitants represent a remnant population of early hominins.
The anatomy of the foot described in the new paper might finally answer the pathological modern vs. primitive population question. Although the foot is characteristic of a biped—being stiff and having no opposable big toe—many other traits fall outside of the range for modern humans. The H. floresiensis foot is very long in proportion to the lower limb and considerably more than half the length of the thighbone; modern human feet are relatively shorter at about half of the femur's length. The stubby big toe of the hobbits is another primitive, chimp-like trait. But the pivotal clue comes from the navicular bone, an important tarsal bone that helps form the arch in a modern human foot. The "hobbit" navicular bone is more akin to that found in great apes, which means that these hominins lacked an arch and were not efficient long-term runners.
"Arches are the hallmark of a modern human foot," explains Harcourt-Smith. "This is another strong piece of the evidence that the "hobbit" was not like us."
Researchers also assessed the pathology hypothesis by comparing "hobbit" feet to those of typical modern humans and pathological modern specimens such as pituitary dwarfs. While the pathological specimens fell well within the range of modern humans, the "hobbits" did not. This suggests that H. floresiensis was an unusual, isolated population of early hominins.
"The fossil record continues to surprise us," says William Jungers, Chairman of the Department of Anatomical Sciences at Stony Brook University Medical Center, and an author on the study. "H. floresiensis is either an island-dwarfed descendant of H. erectus that not only underwent body-size reduction but also extensive evolutionary reversals, or, as our analysis suggests, it represents a new species full of primitive retentions from an ancestor that dispersed out of Africa much earlier than anyone would have predicted. Either way, the implications for human evolution are profound."
- 'Hobbits' are a new human species -- according to the statistical analysis of fossilsThu, 19 Nov 2009, 5:14:38 EST
- Is the Hobbit's brain unfeasibly small?Tue, 26 Jan 2010, 19:37:37 EST
- Blocking the critical structure that lets cancer cells move -- their feetThu, 16 Dec 2010, 10:29:09 EST
- On their own 2 feetThu, 10 Feb 2011, 14:38:10 EST
- The bigger the animal, the stiffer the 'shoes'Wed, 24 Feb 2010, 11:55:03 EST
- New analysis shows 'hobbits' couldn't hustlefrom Biology News NetThu, 7 May 2009, 1:07:26 EDT
- 'Hobbits' Couldn't Hustle: Feet Of Homo Floresiensis Were Primitive But Not Pathologicalfrom Science DailyWed, 6 May 2009, 17:35:32 EDT
- Homo Floresiensis - Hobbit Feet Were Primitive But Not Pathological (So They Took It Slow)from Scientific BloggingWed, 6 May 2009, 15:14:14 EDT
- New analysis shows 'hobbits' couldn't hustlefrom Science BlogWed, 6 May 2009, 13:49:12 EDT
- "Hobbit" Foot Like No Other In Human Fossil Recordfrom Newswise - ScinewsWed, 6 May 2009, 13:29:35 EDT
- New analysis shows 'hobbits' couldn't hustlefrom PhysorgWed, 6 May 2009, 13:28:36 EDT
- Island life - a probable reason for hobbit's small brainfrom Science CentricWed, 6 May 2009, 13:28:19 EDT
Latest Science NewsletterGet the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox! It's free!
Check out our next project, Biology.Net
From other science news sites
Popular science news articles
No popular news yet
No popular news yet
- Stem cell transplant restores memory, learning in mice
- 2 landmark studies report on success of using image-guided brachytherapy to treat cervical cancer
- Calculating tsunami risk for the US East Coast
- Researchers discover mushrooms can provide as much vitamin D as supplements
- Cutting back on sleep harms blood vessel function and breathing control