NIST stairwell evacuation study finds 'what we know we don't know'
Most of the time, we use the stairs in buildings—especially in high-rise structures—only as a back-up for faster elevators and escalators, but during a fire or other emergency, stairs become our primary passage to survival. In a new study, researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) examined what we know about how stairs work as an emergency evacuation route and found that the answer is—not nearly enough. NIST researchers studied people movement speeds during three full-building fire drill evacuations and compared the data to already published results—including those from NIST’s investigation of the World Trade Center disaster on Sept. 11, 2001— to try to identify the factors that could hamper rapid evacuation using stairways. Their conclusions: research to date provides limited insight into how people react and behave during evacuations, and that for the most part, variances in speed cannot be explained by the evacuation models currently used in building design and emergency planning. Or as the title of the new NIST report acknowledges, “What we know we don’t know.”
Building engineers typically use five factors to describe occupant descent down stairwells during building evacuations: pre-evacuation delay, distance traveled during evacuation (movement from higher floors versus lower), counterflow situations (such as firefighters moving up a stairwell while occupants are moving down), stairwell geometry and density of persons in the stairwell. Models make use of such variables to predict the performance of egress systems and the expected speed for a complete evacuation.
However, the NIST researchers found that these engineering parameters could only explain about 13 percent of the differences they observed in evacuation speeds for the three fire drills. Since these speeds were similar to ones reported by previous studies, the researchers suggest that psychological and behavioral factors may be more important in determining how fast occupants can actually exit a building. They also note that inaccurate evacuation data based on simplifications about behavior could lead to unsafe building designs and procedures.
“Clearly,” the researchers state in the report, “there is a need to better understand all the factors that impact the ability of building occupants to take appropriate protective action in the event of a building emergency.”
Source: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Related
- Safer buildings are goal of new code changes based on recommendations from NIST WTC investigationFri, 3 Oct 2008, 10:21:51 EDT
- NIST study offers first detailed look at the progress of a wildland-urban fireWed, 17 Jun 2009, 11:24:55 EDT
- Transit systems are not well-integrated into local emergency plansTue, 22 Jul 2008, 15:35:59 EDT
- Report reveals communication needs, recreation use during firesWed, 10 Sep 2008, 12:40:10 EDT
- Making a good impression: Nanoimprint lithography tests at NISTThu, 1 May 2008, 11:42:17 EDT
Other sources
- Stairwell evacuation study finds 'what we know we don't know'from PhysorgWed, 25 Mar 2009, 14:07:28 EDT
- NIST stairwell evacuation study finds 'what we know we don't know'from Science BlogWed, 25 Mar 2009, 11:50:17 EDT
- Stairwell Evacuation Study Finds 'What We Know We Don't Know'from Newswise - ScinewsTue, 24 Mar 2009, 21:21:11 EDT
Latest Science Newsletter
Get the latest and most popular science news articles of the week in your Inbox!Learn more about
Popular science news articles
- Facebook profiles capture true personality, according to new psychology research
- Shape shifters: Researchers create new breed of antennas
- Typhoon Nida's cloud tops dropping as it zigzags in wind shear
- Will copper keep us safe from the superbugs?
- Homicide rates linked to trust in governement, sense of belonging, study suggests
- First-ever blueprint of a minimal cell is more complex than expected
- Implant-based cancer vaccine is first to eliminate tumors in mice
- Brain's fear center is equipped with a built-in suffocation sensor
- New study finds men and women may respond differently to danger
- Tough yet stiff deer antler is materials scientist's dream
- New study released on World AIDS Day measures HIV anti-retroviral regimens' safety and efficacy
- A closer look at the Hudson Canyon shows why the canyon is critical for fish
- Aspirin, tylenol may decrease effectiveness of vaccines
- Oklahoma cancer study takes major step toward improved treatment
- Why females live longer than males: is it due to the father's sperm?
- Implant-based cancer vaccine is first to eliminate tumors in mice
- Study shows new brain connections form rapidly during motor learning
- Brain scan study shows cocaine abusers can control cravings
- Study sheds light on brain's fear processing center
- First-ever blueprint of a minimal cell is more complex than expected
- New evidence that dark chocolate helps ease emotional stress
- African desert rift confirmed as new ocean in the making
- Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice
- New study links vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular disease and death
- Polyphenols and polyunsaturated fatty acids boost the birth of new neurons